Logic Behind "Presidential Privilege" Should Exclude BUSH from using it: HE NEVER GOT "GOOD-ADVICE."

PRESIDENT BUSH [& DICK CHENEY, ETC.] SAYS "NO" TO EVERY BIT OF CONGRESSIONAL-OVERSIGHT, AND INVOKES PRESIDENTIAL PRIVILEGE... HE SAYS HIS [RETARDED?] DELIBERATIONS NEED TO BE PRIVATE SO HE CAN GET CANDID, "GOOD ADVICE."

BUT BUSH'S FAILURE TO GET GOOD ADVICE IS WELL-KNOWN. IN FACT, HE SEEMS TO GET ONLY BAD-ADVICE. HE DOESN'T LIKE CRITICISM, HE SURROUNDS HIMSELF WITH YES-MEN... OIL-CRONIES, TEXANS, NEOCONS, AND PEOPLE LIKE DICK CHENEY -- NONE-OF-WHOM PUT THE INTERESTS OF THE COUNTRY FIRST...

SOMEONE SHOULD CALL HIM ON THAT SH!T.
*************************************
From a LEGAL STANDPOINT: attorney-client privilege does not apply to illegal-activities... Think of a dirty mob-lawyer; his communications with a client about covering-up a murder ARE NOT PRIVILEGED.

Similarly, Bush's communications with anybody about covering-up the possible MURDER of Pat Tilman, are NOT PRIVILEGED.

Most of Bush's claims of Executive Privilege would not hold up in a (un-infected) Court of Law... Especially the million-or-so ILLEGAL GOVERNMENT emails on the RNC servers [Karl?].

IMPEACH, TRY, CONVICT, & INCARCERATE. Then, throw-away the key(s), Herb