Congress Approves Bush's Illegal Domestic Spying? ...What? *CANCEL*...*ESCAPE*!!!
UPDATE 8/6: In an editorial entitled, “Warrantless Surrender,” the Washington Post writes that Congress was “stampeded into another compromise of Americans’ rights.” The Post adds the bill was “as reckless as it was unnecessary” and “was scarcely considered at all.”
-END UPDATE-And that's the Post, so... 'Nuff said!
Bush created a false sense-of-urgency, citing the Boogey Man, and telling Congress the Capitol would
uh~implode!~ if they didn't act fast. Actually Bush was panicking because a Federal Judge recently confirmed the NSA eavesdropping-gig is
completely illegal...
BUSH needed to PROTECT
HIMSELF, not the public...
THEY SCREWED-UP: George Bush, and Alberto Gonzales now have the legal-authority to spy on you and I without a warrant, at any time...
[Abuse power, break-laws, to steal election(s)]AND THEY'LL DO IT AGAIN, TOO!
WHY WOULDN'T THEY, NOW? [Harry/Nancy?]
the job Congress is doing... That'll show 'em.
But what-the-hell was Congress thinking? [The leadership.] Bush asked for twice as much as he wanted... Congress balked a little, and then "compromised," supposedly reigning Bush-in...
Textbook-karl-rove: IT WAS A TOTAL RUSE!
Can someone request a "redo?" ...A Mulligan?
-END UPDATE-And that's the Post, so... 'Nuff said!
Bush created a false sense-of-urgency, citing the Boogey Man, and telling Congress the Capitol would
uh~implode!~ if they didn't act fast. Actually Bush was panicking because a Federal Judge recently confirmed the NSA eavesdropping-gig is
completely illegal...
BUSH needed to PROTECT
HIMSELF, not the public...
THEY SCREWED-UP: George Bush, and Alberto Gonzales now have the legal-authority to spy on you and I without a warrant, at any time...
We recall in one Gonzales appearance before Congress when the illegal spying story first broke that he could not provide assurance that the spying was not being used for political purposes. Does anyone think that given past experience the Bush White House would NOT use domestic spying powers to gain political advantage?!WE SHOULD ASSUME THEY ALREADY DID, STILL DO...
[Abuse power, break-laws, to steal election(s)]AND THEY'LL DO IT AGAIN, TOO!
WHY WOULDN'T THEY, NOW? [Harry/Nancy?]
...Democrats in Congress should be impeaching Gonzales, Cheney and Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors, not enabling their continued efforts to establish a de facto dictatorship for radical extremists.I'm voting "disapprove" next-time I get polled on
Bush is as low in the polls as a president has historically been. He and Cheney are one door away from being nailed with multiple counts of illegal activity – and that’s just from what is visible to us at this time. God knows what is still hidden below the tip of the iceberg.
Amidst this sordid unraveling of a corrupt administration that is intent on destroying democracy and the Constitution, the Democrats in the Senate and House give Bush more legal power to spy on us!
the job Congress is doing... That'll show 'em.
But what-the-hell was Congress thinking? [The leadership.] Bush asked for twice as much as he wanted... Congress balked a little, and then "compromised," supposedly reigning Bush-in...
Textbook-karl-rove: IT WAS A TOTAL RUSE!
Can someone request a "redo?" ...A Mulligan?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home