"THE BUCK STOPS..." --OH, NEVERMIND! [It doesn't stop.]

WORDS, for The "President" [From: Keith Olberman]

Ladies and Gentlemen...

KEITH OLBERMANN: Finally tonight, a special comment about President Clinton‘s interview. The headlines about it are, of course, entirely wrong. It is not essential that a past present bullied and sandbagged by a monkey posing as a newscaster finally lashed back. It is not important that the current president‘s portable public chorus has described his predecessor‘s tone as crazed. Our tone should be crazed. The nation‘s freedoms are under assault by an administration‘s policies can do us as much damage as al Qaeda. The nation‘s marketplace of ideas is being poisoned by a propaganda company [-- FOX News --] so blatant that Tokyo Rose would have quit.
:::
The Bush administration did not try to get Osama bin Laden before 9/11. The Bush administration ignored all the evidence gathered by its predecessors. The Bush administration did not understand the daily briefing entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” The Bush administration did not try. Moreover, for the five years, one month, and two weeks, the current administration and in particular the president has been given the greatest pass for incompetence and malfeasance in American history.

President Roosevelt was rightly blamed for ignoring the warning signs, some of them 17 years old before Pearl Harbor. President Hoover was correctly blamed for, if not the Great Depression itself, then the disastrous economic steps he took in the immediate aftermath of the stock market crash. Even President Lincoln assumed some measure of responsibility for the Civil War, though talk of Southern secession had begun as early as 1832.

But for this president. To hear him bleat and whine and bully at nearly every opportunity, one would think someone else had been president on September 11, 2001 or the nearly eight months that preceded it.
:::
...Mr. Bush has now moved on, unmistakably and without conscience or shame, towards rewriting history, and attempting to make the responsibility entirely Mr. Clinton‘s.

Of course, he is not honest enough to do that directly. As with all the other nefariousness and slime of this, our worst presidency since James Buchanan, he is having it done for him by proxy. Thus, the sandbag effort by Fox News Friday afternoon.

Consider the timing: The very weekend the National Intelligence Estimate would be released and show the Iraq war to be the fraudulent failure it is-not a check on terror, but fertilizer for it. The kind of proof of incompetence, for which the administration and its hyenas at Fox need to find a diversion, in a scapegoat.
:::
The smearing by proxy, of course, did not begin Friday afternoon. Disney was first to sell-out its corporate reputation, with “The Path to 9/11.” Of that company‘s crimes against truth one needs to say little. Simply put: Someone there enabled an authoritarian zealot to belch out Mr.
Bush‘s new and improved history.

The basic plot-line was this: Because he was distracted by the Monica Lewinsky scandal, Bill Clinton failed to prevent 9/11. The most curious and in some ways the most infuriating aspect of this slapdash theory, is that the right wingers who have advocated it—who try to sneak it into our collective consciousness through entertainment, or who sandbag Mr. Clinton with it at news interviews—have simply skipped past its most glaring flaw.

Had it been true that Clinton had been distracted from the hunt for bin Laden in 1998 because of the Lewinsky nonsense, why did these same people not applaud him for having bombed bin Laden‘s camps in Afghanistan and Sudan on Aug. 20, of that year? For mentioning bin Laden by name as he did so? That day, Republican Senator Grams of Minnesota invoked the movie “Wag the Dog.” Republican Senator Coats of Indiana questioned Mr. Clinton‘s judgment. Republican Senator Ashcroft of Missouri—the future attorney general echoed Coats. ...Even Republican Senator Arlen Specter questioned the timing.

And of course, were it true Clinton had been distracted by the Lewinsky witch-hunt, who on earth conducted the Lewinsky witch-hunt? Who turned the political discourse of this nation on its head for two years? Who corrupted the political media? Who made it impossible for us to even bring back on the air the counter-terrorism analysts like Dr. Richard Haass, and James Dunegan, who had warned, at this very hour, on this very network, in early 1998, of cells from the Middle East who sought to attack us here? Who preempted them in order to strangle us with the trivia that was, “All Monica All The Time?” Who distracted whom? This is, of course, where, as is inevitable, Mr. Bush and his henchmen prove not quite as smart as they think they are. The full responsibility for 9/11 is obviously shared by three administrations, possibly four.

But, Mr. Bush, if you are now trying to convince us by proxy that it‘s all about the distractions of 1998 and 1999, then you will have to face a startling fact that your minions may have hidden from you. The distractions of 1998 and 1999, Mr. Bush, were carefully manufactured, and lovingly executed, not by Bill Clinton, but by the same people who got you elected president. Thus, instead of some commendable acknowledgment that you were even in office on 9/11 and the lost months before it, we have your sleazy and sloppy rewriting of history, designed by somebody who evidently read the Orwell playbook too quickly.

Thus, instead of some explanation for the inertia of your first eight months in office, we are told that you have kept us “safe” ever since—a statement that might range anywhere from zero, to 100 percent, true. We have nothing but your word, and your word has long since ceased to mean anything.
And, of course, the one time you have ever given us specifics about what you have kept us safe from, Mr. Bush, you got the name of the supposedly targeted tower in Los Angeles wrong.

Thus was it left for the previous president to say what so many of us have felt; what so many of us have given you a pass for in the months and even the years after the attack: You did not try. You ignored the evidence gathered by your predecessor. You ignored the evidence gathered by your own people. Then, you blamed your predecessor.

That would be a textbook definition, sir, of cowardice.
:::
And so has Mr. Clinton helped us to disenthrall ourselves, and perhaps enabled us, even at this late and bleak date, to save our country.
The free pass has been withdrawn, Mr. Bush.
You did not act to prevent 9/11...

You have failed us-then leveraged that failure, to justify a purposeless war in Iraq which will have, all too soon, claimed more American lives than did 9/11...

And you have now tried to hide your failures, by blaming your predecessor.

And now you exploit your failure, to rationalize brazen torture which doesn‘t work anyway; which only condemns our soldiers to water-boarding; which only humiliates our country further in the world; and which no true American would ever condone, let alone advocate.
And there it is, sir. Are yours the actions of a true American?
[END]
Thank you, sir, Herb.

Chris "Weasel" Wallace, & "Faux" Fox News: SPANKED... DOWN! (On UBL propaganda-bullsh!t)

"A wag of the finger," indeed. Bill Clinton defends himself! [from the America-haters] William J...well done, damn!
Be sure to see it, somewhere that still has links.
It was good, Herb. ...Wallace -- the little weasel -- was utterly humiliated on national-television-- his own damn show!!!

UPDATE: ThinkProgress has the 'script, HERE.

The Bush Administration Prepares For Midterm Elections...

+ Democratic control
of Congress...
Just kidding.
Not, Herb.

INCOMPETENCE, INC.: Their Policies Have Clearly Left America Less Safe...

It's nothing personal, they just SUCK at their jobs, LIE incessantly, and they have POOR JUDGEMENT. They're ALWAYS WRONG!Outwitted by "cavemen..." That's funny.
Maybe not, "ha-ha," funny...
Kinda sad & pathetic-funny;
And pretty damned embarrassing
for the rest-of-us -- "funny," Herb.

THE UNITED STATES? OF AMERICA?

Makes you wannna torture somebody for information. Or for spite, Herb.
(Or a Dollar.)

GUESS WHO THOUGHT "BIPARTISANSHIP" WAS TWO WORDS: "BY PARTISANSHIP?"

What an idiot...

Re-define "TORTURE?" Jesus! ...What a BLOODY DISGRACE!

IMAGINE IF THIS WAS RE: THE 1996 CLINTON / GORE CAMPAIGN

(From our hometown paper...)
The investigative Toledo Blade:

Noe [pictured here] gets 27 months in prison; ex-coin dealer says he was pressured by Bush campaign...

Tom Noe, the GOP fund-raiser at the heart of Ohio’s biggest political scandal in a generation, claimed that pressure from the Bush-Cheney campaign led him to commit the campaign-finance crimes for which he was sentenced yesterday to federal prison.U.S. District Judge David Katz ordered Noe, 52, to spend 27 months in prison and to pay $136,200 in fines for giving two dozen friends and associates money to attend a high-priced luncheon with President Bush in 2003 in Columbus...

Remember: Ohio was the decisive state in the 2004 Presidential election; like Florida in 2000. [READ: THE SCENE OF THE CRIME.]

So...Interesting it's not in the national "news."
Read the whole thing... Later, Herb.

DON'T STEP IN THE SH!T... On ABC/Disney's "The Path To 9/11"

G.O.P. PEDDLING FEAR, SMEARING CRITICS... ELECTION-TIME!

In the face of the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt implored the nation to defeat fear and to sacrifice for the common good, New York Times columnist Frank Rich writes in Sunday's paper...

Bush was asked at a press conference "how much of a sacrifice" ordinary Americans would "be expected to make in their daily lives, in their daily routines." His answer: "Our hope, of course, is that they make no sacrifice whatsoever." He, too, wanted to move on -- to "see life return to normal in America," as he put it -- but toward partisan goals stealthily tailored to his political allies rather than the nearly 90 percent of the country that, according to polls, was rallying around him.
This selfish agenda was there from the very start. As we now know from many firsthand accounts, a cadre from Bush's war Cabinet was already busily hyping nonexistent links between Iraq and the Qaida attacks. The presidential press secretary, Ari Fleischer, condemned Bill Maher's irreverent comic response to 9/11 by reminding "all Americans that they need to watch what they say, watch what they do." Fear itself -- the fear that "paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance," as FDR had it -- was already being wielded as a weapon against Americans by their own government.

Less than a month after 9/11, the president was making good on his promise of "no sacrifice whatsoever." Speaking in Washington about how it was "the time to be wise" and "the time to act," he declared, "We need for there to be more tax cuts." Before long the GOP would be selling 9/11 photos of the president on Air Force One...
And so here we are five years later. Fearmongering remains unceasing. So do tax cuts. So does the war against a country that did not attack us on 9/11. We have moved on, but no one can argue that we have moved ahead.

MORE HERE: According to the president's pre-9/11 anniversary speeches on the progress of the war on terror, we're safer than we were before the attacks but not yet safe enough to steer clear of his failed stay-the-course strategy. As Bush explains it, al-Qaida's leadership is decimated but remains dangerous enough to destroy the entire civilized world...

The end... I-I - I' -- I'm scared, Herb.

What "Intelligence Failure?" But... How About All Those Warnings?

Oh, I see... NEVER MIND, Herb.

Boil It Down: There's Only ONE "SECURITY GAP" Which Led To Nine-Eleven:

"Mind the gap," indeed...
We have no links... to speak of.
[Editor's note: TV NEWS SUCKS.]
'Nuff said, Herb.

Iraq'd

Click-pic[tm] for full-size...